|
|
Case Studies
|
Design Review
We have developed our design review methodology over the last ten years to provide a
systematic, traceable system that allows easy audit of work done, by whom and when.
Previous versions of assessments made are stored in their entirety with date and time
details. Our methodology incorporates any hazards raised as part of a designer’s risk
assessment into our hazard lists and quickly allows a review of the manufacturer’s stated
risk control methods.
- Functional System Structure. The first step is to produce the Functional System
Structure (FSS). This provides the basis for all further analysis by grouping and
listing the functional elements of the entire system in a hierarchical tree, and
describing the functional intent for each.
- Hazard Identification. The hazard identification process (HAZID) enables
HSEC to identify hazards associated with the interface between the ride and the
rider at a system level. This will focus on hazards related to the design and
operation of the system, but also begin to deal with hazards associated with the
failure of the ride to perform intended functions. The process for hazard
identification is based on that described in BS EN 1050:1996, supplemented by those contained within
BS EN 13814:2004 ‘Fairground and Amusement Park Machinery and Structures -
Safety’.
- Failure Mode, Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA). The FMECA is a
detailed analysis of each of the functional elements identified during the
production of the Functional System Structure. Ways in which each element could
fail to achieve its functional intent are postulated and potential causes and
consequences of these failure modes identified and described. The frequency of
the causes and severity of the consequences are then ranked. The potential for
detection of the failure mode before the identified consequence ensues is then
described. This may include detection through either maintenance or
automatically by the control system. Once described, the detection is ranked.
The three rankings for Frequency, Severity and Detection are then multiplied
together and a Risk Priority Number (RPN) is generated.
- Assessment of Safety Criticality. Each functional element of the
Functional System Structure is assigned a level of safety criticality.
- Summary Sheet and Hazard Close-out. Once the FMECA is completed for a
functional element, a summary sheet will be compiled. This sheet will
demonstrate how the manufacturer of the ride has closed-out all the hazards
identified. The detail level of this assessment will be dependent on the level
of safety criticality assigned. This serves to ensure that engineering expertise
is devoted primarily to areas of the rides where the risk is highest. Compliance
with relevant standards is often one means of controlling many hazards. Critical
and other items to be checked during Conformity Assessment are logged to be
included in a schedule of inspections required to be completed to confirm the
ride conforms to design. Performance aspects that it is essential to witness
during initial test are similarly identified as part of the review and logged.
- Approval. Each summary sheet assessment is subject to an internal check
prior to being individually approved by another member of the engineering team.
This check includes both procedural and technical details.
- Hazard Log. Each failure mode or hazard raised during the review is
compiled into a log detailing where it was raised and how it is closed out. It
is in addition to any hazard log produced by the manufacturer/designer. This is
an essential part of the process since it ensures that the review is both
thorough and systematic.
- Recommendations. Any recommendations relevant to a particular item are
logged on the Summary Sheet for inclusion in our report. Following recent
discussion with clients, our summary sheet system has been adapted to allow HSEC
to easily audit and track which recommendations have been completed, when and by
who. This allows outstanding recommendations to be systematically completed and
compliance to be monitored and reported upon. All recommendations are listed in
our verification report.
|